| Home | About Us | Contact Us | Support | Search | | Facility | | PBO | Education & Outreach | ||
![]() |
![]() | |||||||
|
Project Support Science Applications of GPS Active Tectonics Crustal Deformation Educational Outreach Intraplate Deformation Deep Earth Dynamics Plate Rigidity Polar Studies and Glaciology Plate Boundary Zone Tectonic Geomorphology Volcano Studies Volcano Monitoring |
Science Applications of GPS: Plate Rigidity
![]() Photo courtesy of Seth Stein - New Madrid Seismic Zone Study On this page
Plate Rigidity and Intraplate DeformationThe rigidity of major plates, a key premise of plate tectonic theory untestable two decades ago, is being quantified with GPS data. The stable interiors of plates appear surprisingly rigid, to better than a few mm/yr.
Figure 7 - Comparison of GPS-derived velocities (with 95% confidence ellipses) for permanent GPS sites in North America east of the Rocky Mountains to velocities predicted by modeling these sites as being on a single rigid plate (arrows with no ellipse). The rigid plate model fits the GPS velocity field well, indicating that the interior of the North American plate is rigid at least to the level of the average velocity residual, less than 2 mm/yr. These data place bounds on continental scale differential motion east and west of the New Madrid seismic zone (20). Deviations from plate rigidity, in areas of intraplate seismicity such as the Wabash Valley and New Madrid seismic zones (21), are being investigated. The results can be surprising. For example, GPS data in the New Madrid zone show very small deformation, suggesting that the recurrence time for large earthquakes may be much longer than previously assumed, and implying that the seismic hazard at New Madrid may be considerably less than often assumed. Such studies of intraplate seismic zones should shed light into the stresses within continental interiors and how they cause deformation and earthquakes.
Figure 8 - The expected recurrence interval for a great earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone can be estimated from GPS observations showing at most a few mm/yr of fault-parallel motion, assuming the horizontal slip in the great 1811-1812 earthquakes was a few meters, as inferred from historical accounts. Last modified Monday, 26-Nov-2007 16:11:58 MST |
|
![]() |
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Support | Search | Facility | PBO | Education & Outreach Comments: webmaster |
|